"What puzzles me a little is that bad maybe Carlos Rentería thinks a countercultural magazine should not be sold in Sanborn-Fadanelli and apparently thinks so when he says:" Our distribution [is Mold concerns ] is useless, precarious, accidental, but I prefer to be in a fucking Sanborns "- but in the libraries of the State, such as network Educal Books and Art. Accordingly, a magazine like ours [Replicator], produced with our money and our effort, should not tarnish, to show off shamelessly in detestable Sanborns, the virginal purity of the counter-anything that's in the Digital Age of rampant globalization. But, yes, editors should ask for (and to require sombrerazos, as some do) CONACULTA grants and subsidies (after scholarships are up for the holes Fonca fonqui, H. Yepez dixit) and perhaps dare negotiate humble exchanges with bookstores, restaurants, bars and small businesses. "
" I am sure that the evil Carlos plays with me. Everyone knows that your magazine [ Generation], from which no one doubts his counterculture lineage has survived a lifetime event by the State and also boasts of not paying contributions. It's just not a business, says Carlos rogue, as if to clarify: a treacherous and dirty business. " And how do I say that Replicante think it is? Or rather, it wants to be. As are businesses that Carlos buy alcohol, food, clothing, shoes, medicines, books, CDs, appliances, gifts for him, his family. And alcohol. And as the businesses that buy the paper for your magazine and the printing and binding. Because I know, no free lunch in this world (or CONACULTA), and if we can pay to the many writers, illustrators, designers working with Replicant going to do, even if modestly, but not want-and for that we are looking for the damn advertising. (Do not know why the gods, and officials are smiling every time you mention the word "counterculture."
* Rogelio Villarreal. cultural journalism in the time of the globaphobia. Mexico: Ediciones no name. 2006. 107 p.
0 comments:
Post a Comment